equivalence transformation theory
https://gyazo.com/9bf1823e974bad23dd77e7b8717490ad
Aο- one of the specific events in the original system (starting system) (issue to be cleared or other model)
Bτ - Event (invention, completion of development) that appeared in the transformation system (attained system)
vi - Perspective (angle or position from which to look at things, direction of thinking: choose one perspective that fits your development objectives)
ε - abstract elements extracted from Aο under one perspective (the core of things, the center of desire)
c - limiting conditions that give concreteness to abstract elements
cε - concept (idea) at the core of embodied development
Σa - a special set of conditions for the original system (unnecessary elements in the model, subject to disposal during development)
Special set of conditions for Σb-transformed systems (new elements required at the time of development, subject to introduction)
Don't think of it as a formula, it's a picture.
Well, "structural formula" is also a diagram, so "formula" doesn't necessarily mean "equation."
https://gyazo.com/589387a08ddf468f9866f72caf3b1c7e
This is easier to understand.
All of the following emphasized analogical thinking
At the same time, the problem-solving method TRIZ by Outshuler was born in Russia (1946). Ichikawa: "How can analogy lead to the creation of new concepts when it is in principle mimetic thinking?"
The essence of creative thinking is determined by a pattern of thinking that conceptually processes one or both of two different objects, introduces an appropriate point of view, and finds as many of the various aspects (equivalence) common to both as possible" ("Creativity Research Vol. 1," 1964, Seishinshobo, p. 20).
https://gyazo.com/aba57ec6821fcdd802c29075aa93b5dd
Is this what you mean?
Criticizes the tendency of analogies to be biased toward superficial features.
Talking about how to do abstraction.
https://gyazo.com/589387a08ddf468f9866f72caf3b1c7e
flowchart
I wonder if they thought to verbalize the analogy process in more detail so that it could be consciously implemented.
The story of how to explore departure system A
What is a "point of view"?
Direction of resolution."
I thought it was "the two images appear to overlap depending on the viewing direction", but I guess not.
The Nature of the Problem."
Verbalize your point of view."
interesting
https://gyazo.com/309d7ef2625c08795c51ff7cec7f69c7
Situations where you can answer [What would you like to see happen?
Look for examples that include "what happens."
Remove irrelevant features from the "how" part of that case study.
Then add the characteristics of the problem area
Abstract and apply
Climbing down metaphor by Yotaro Hatamura.
The "P" in the figure is the P of PDCA.
One of the methods of [How to generate the first P
Since the PDCA cycle has not yet been born from time to time
The analogy makes this process one step that isn't specifically verbalized.
Are you saying "it's not an analogy" in reference to the fact that it was verbalized and divided into steps?
Because analogies deal with similarity through non-verbal methods, they tend to be biased toward superficial similarities, such as similarities in appearance.
Did you try to eliminate bias by verbalizing the steps and consciously doing so?
---
This page is auto-translated from /nishio/等価変換理論 using DeepL. If you looks something interesting but the auto-translated English is not good enough to understand it, feel free to let me know at @nishio_en. I'm very happy to spread my thought to non-Japanese readers.